Archive
May  2016
Are you thinking with handcuffs?
Click here to get a Free Subscription to The Headscratcher Post. 

A monthly post with tips and techniques about problem solving, creativity, innovation and critical thinking
The Headscratcher Post © Headscratchers, LLC
Visit us at www.headscratchers.com
If you're not already a subscriber to The HeadScratcher Post,
Signup Here

Previous versions of The HeadScratcher Post
HeadScratchersLLC
Critical Thinking Techniques for Problem Solving, Decision Making and Creativity.

Our Mission;
To help people become better HeadScratchers! We teach critical thinking techniques to managers, leaders and individuals resulting in the improved performance of an individual and organization.
Think Smarter
[Critical Thinking to Improve Problem Solving and Decision Making Skills]
220 pages of Critical Thinking Stuff !
Over 25 critical thinking tools, with examples and exercises
Check out our Workshops
Critical Thinking for Problem Solving and Decision Making
Critical Thinking for Innovation
Advanced Critical Thinking and Decision Making
Critical Thinking for Leaders
May  2016    The Headscratcher Post © Headscratchers LLC     Edition 123
 
                                        Announcements
PMI Mile Hi Chapter Meeting May 10,11 - Mike Kallet will be speaking.
ATD International conference
- May 22-25, Denver.  Mike speaking at The Future of Work, &  Critical Thinking sessions.  Book signing session too.

Open Enrollment Workshop - August 4, 2016 - Denver.
Are you thinking with handcuffs?
Over the years, I’ve noticed that when people define a problem to be solved, they often put an initial boundary condition (constraint) on the problem.   Having your hands tied in this way, greatly reduces the options and possibilities of new ideas.

Here are a few “cuffs” that tie our hands and how you might view them differently, i.e. un-cuff your hands.

“Trade off” cuffs:  When solving problems we often assume that some of our goals are inversely tied together, i.e. you can only achieve one at the detriment of the other.   For example; In the HeadScratcher, “How do I balance quantity vs quality?”   Indeed these are often connected, but before you assume they are, why not start with the HeadScratcher, “How do we achieve both our quality and quantity goals?”   Instead of starting with “This OR That”, start with “This AND That”

“More of the same” cuffs:
  I’ve seen many headscratchers  stated like; “We have lost people on our project.  How do we quickly hire their replacement so we still meet our schedule?”  It may come down to hiring people, but the problem really  is “How do we achieve our schedule?”.   Hiring more people may be one way, but perhaps there are others; e.g. reduce scope, schedule overtime, negotiate a new schedule, increase productivity, reduce errors, etc.   Just because you lost people from your project doesn’t mean the solution is rehiring.  Instead of “How do we replace what we lost”, use “How do we achieve our goal”.  Perhaps you’ll discover other ways beyond the original one.

“False Assumption” cuffs:   A mistake often occurs because we make assumptions about an initial condition without first verifying that the assumption is true.  For example; we make assumptions about what our customer needs.    This assumption might be based on what the customer says, even what they document as a requirement.   So we deliver on that request, only to find that our assumption about what they really meant is different.  Instead of assuming you know, verify it.

“We did that before” cuffs:  Experience is a valuable asset, but sometimes we mistakenly associate a new situation as being the same as one that we have experience with.  While it might look similar, perhaps there are changes or small differences that makes this situation a bit different.   Even if it’s the same as before, perhaps there are new tools, technologies, and people that, this time, might make a difference.   Instead of starting with the view of “been there, done that”, maybe start with “might have been there, might have done that, but let’s take another look”.

"Can't do” cuffs:  This is the classic, “I/we can’t do that”.   Change that to “I/we can do it”.   Change your thinking from “it can’t be solved” to “there’s a solution out there, we just have to find it”

“They’ll never approve it” cuffs.
   Many ideas never make it beyond an initial thought because the thinking is that management / leadership would never approve such a thing.  Maybe so, but instead of starting with “them”, start with “we”.   Turn it around.  Add “convincing” as a component of your solution, as opposed to a barrier.  Ask “how can we persuade management/leadership”.

The Takeaway:
When critically thinking and being creative, start with your hands free instead of wearing handcuffs that significantly reduce your options and creativity.
@2004-2016 HeadScratchers, LLC., All rights Reserved
Announcement
Special Open Enrollment Workshop
August 4 in Denver
Michael Kallet will be the instructor